Response to Hong Kong T-shirt Sedition Sentencing
Why is this an attack on freedom of expression?
- Chu Kai-pong received a 14-month prison sentence for wearing a “seditious” T-shirt and mask.
- This sentencing showcases a blatant violation of the right to freedom of expression.
What does Chu Kai-pong’s case highlight about the law?
- He is the first person convicted under Hong Kong’s Article 23 law, with vague wording and vast scope.
- The new law punishes individuals for so-called ‘seditious’ acts, expanding the government’s powers.
Why is Amnesty International advocating for Chu Kai-pong’s release?
- Chu Kai-pong committed no internationally recognized crime.
- Amnesty International urges the Hong Kong authorities to repeal the repressive law.
Background:
What led to Chu Kai-pong’s sentencing?
- Chu Kai-pong sentenced to one year and two months for his T-shirt slogan under the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance.
- He was arrested on June 12, 2024, for donning a T-shirt and mask related to the 2019 anti-extradition protests.
What are the implications of the recent legislation?
- Hong Kong’s new national security legislation increases penalties for acts considered seditious.
- The law contains troubling provisions, such as punishing ‘external interference’.
What is the status of sedition charges in Hong Kong?
- Since the enactment of the new law, 12 people have been arrested for sedition, with three charged.
- Chu Kai-pong’s case highlights the restrictive nature of the legislation.
Summary:
The sentencing of Chu Kai-pong for wearing a “seditious” T-shirt and mask in Hong Kong demonstrates a severe clampdown on freedom of expression. As the first person convicted under the repressive law, Amnesty International urges the authorities to repeal this legislation and release him immediately, emphasizing the need to protect human rights in Hong Kong.
Source: www.amnesty.org