Amnesty International analyzes European Court of Human Rights climate judgments
Amnesty International has released a briefing examining three significant climate rulings by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) issued on April 9, 2024.
What is the focus of the analysis?
- The briefing delves into the new climate jurisprudence established by the ECtHR.
- It spotlights Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, a groundbreaking case that underscores states’ responsibility to uphold human rights amidst a worsening climate crisis.
What do the rulings signify?
The rulings emphasize the duty of states to safeguard human rights in the face of climate change, based on the European Convention on Human Rights.
What was the response to the rulings?
Amnesty International’s Head of Strategic Litigation, Mandi Mudarikwa, highlights the importance of strategic litigation in holding governments accountable for climate inaction and protecting vulnerable populations.
What were the outcomes for Switzerland?
Switzerland was found to have violated the rights of older Swiss women due to inadequate climate policies. The Swiss parliament’s decision to partially disregard the ECtHR ruling has raised concerns over the rule of law.
Summary
The analysis of ECtHR climate judgments by Amnesty International sheds light on the increasing global push for climate justice and the need for governments to uphold human rights in the face of environmental challenges.
Source: www.amnesty.org