What did U.S. Bishops condemn regarding the new policy at the southern border?
- U.S. Bishops condemned a new policy restricting the opportunity to seek international protection.
- The policy disregards fundamental humanitarian protections and U.S. asylum law.
Migration lead Bishop Mark J. Seitz expressed deep concern over the new policy.
The International Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC) highlighted the issue.
Why did U.S. Bishops speak out against the new policy?
- The disregard for fundamental humanitarian protections raised alarm among the Bishops.
- U.S. asylum law was also being overlooked by the policy.
Bishop Mark J. Seitz emphasized the importance of upholding humanitarian standards.
The ICMC brought attention to the concerning situation.
What was the response to the new U.S. policy?
- U.S. Bishops condemned the policy for jeopardizing humanitarian protections.
- The policy’s impact on asylum seekers was a major point of concern.
The statement from Bishop Mark J. Seitz highlighted the urgency of the issue.
The ICMC raised awareness about the implications of the new policy.
Summary: U.S. Bishops have spoken out against a new policy at the southern border that undermines fundamental humanitarian protections and U.S. asylum law, signaling a troubling development in the treatment of asylum seekers.
Source: www.icmc.net